The question is... for HOW MUCH?
https://apple.news/AkAKg4fhZQiiwZT7H2neTbA
The question is... for HOW MUCH?
https://apple.news/AkAKg4fhZQiiwZT7H2neTbA
Mike
I’d need an air freshener with a gas scent to feel at peace.
With the sheer amount of mechanical ability, adaptability, and all the other stuff you guys know..
I thought this would be more than a one comment thread.
You all know that our sons of our Grandsons wont be allowed to run combustion motors anymore. (Red Barchetta)
Discuss...
Mike
Ours vans would be prime candidates for a body transfer to an electric chassis IMO. The large area below the floor could hold many batteries without changing the appearance or interior storage capacity. The generally lightweight body would help with overall power to weight ratio. Large speakers near the left rear tire could speak a throaty V8 tune that future generations know only as some kind of canned vegetable cocktail drink.
108VanGuy...
1969 Chevy Panel, 250 CID, 3 ring 4 Spd. with OD, 2.73 "WedgieVan" Daily Driver
1967 Chevy Panel, 230 CID, 3 Spd. 3.36 "UtiliVan Owned since 76
1964 GMC Panel, 194 CID, 3 Spd. "CrunchoVan"
1965 Chevy Panel 350 CID, 3 Spd. "RustoRoof" Runs but wiring bad
1969 Chevy 108 Display 307 CID THM 350 Power Brakes 3.73 Posi
1965 Chevy Panel, V8, 3 Spd. "Gold Hills Van"
1965 CamperVan, V8, 3 Spd.
1969 G20 Shell
Most DIY conversions total cost comes in around $35,000.
I would expect a turnkey conversion to be $50k-$60k
That said, if one is creative, it can be done for less. Rich Rebuilds on youtube did a Mini on the (relatively) cheap.
Gregg Groff
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
1968 Chevy G20 108 panel Now with 454 power!
1965 Chevy G10 panel- OHC Pontiac inline 6
So...I take my LS6 and let them chop it up and pay ANOTHER $70K for that.
Figuring on low end of $120K for the SS..some are closer to $170K.
Im not seeing that car worth $200K just cause its got a cord.
But I guess people pay that for a tesla.
...not even bothering to look. Does a tesla have 450HP?
Last edited by van-itti; 04-05-2021 at 09:41 PM.
Mike
Reply With Quote
